Gautama Buddha in Hinduism

The Buddha has been a formative force in the origins of Hinduism. Regional Hindu texts over the centuries have presented a spectrum of views on Buddhism, possibly reflecting the competition between Buddhism and the Brahmanical traditions.[1] In the Vaishnavite sect of Hinduism, the historic Buddha or Gautama Buddha, is the ninth avatar among the ten major avatars of the god Vishnu.[2][3][4][5][6][1][note 1] In contemporary Hinduism the Buddha is revered by Hindus who usually consider "Buddhism to be another form of Hinduism".[1] Similarly, other Hindus reject the identification of Gautama Buddha as an avatar of Vishnu, referring to the texts of the Puranas and identifying the two as different individuals.

Buddha as an avatar at Dwaraka Tirumala temple, Andhra Pradesh

Avatar of VishnuEdit

 
Some Hindus regard Buddha (bottom centre) as one of the 10 avatars of Vishnu.[5][6]

The Buddha was integrated into Vaishnavism through its mythology in the Vaishnava Puranas, where the Buddha is adopted as the ninth avatar of Vishnu.[7]

ChronologyEdit

The adoption of the Buddha in texts relating to Hindu gods, and of Hindu gods in Buddhist texts, is difficult to place chronologically. According to Doniger, the myth of the Buddha avatar first appeared in the pre-Gupta period, when orthodox Brahminism was threatened by the success of Buddhism and Jainism, and by foreign invaders.[8] According to Doniger, "Hindus came to regard the Buddha as an avatar of Vishnu between A.D. 450 and the sixth century," first appearing in the Vishnu Purana (400-500 CE).[9] According to John Holt, "The replacement of the Buddha as the "cosmic person" within the mythic ideology of Indian kingship [...] occurred at about the same time the Buddha was incorporated and subordinated within the Brahmanical cult of Visnu."[10]

TextsEdit

The Buddha is mentioned as an avatar of Vishnu in the Puranas and the epics such as:

Another important scripture that mentions him as an avatar is Parashara's Brihat Parashara Hora Shastra (2:1-5/7).

Buddha as an avatar of Vishnu is part of a cosmic cycle, in which the dharma is destroyed in the Kali Yuga, and then restored again in the Satya Yuga, when Vishnu incarnates as Kalki.[12] The Bhavishya Purana incorporates historical facts about dynastical lineages, stating the following:

At this time, reminded of the Kali Age, the god Vishnu became born as Gautama, the Shakyamuni, and taught the Buddhist dharma for ten years. Then Shuddodana ruled for twenty years, and Shakyasimha for twenty. At the first stage of the Kali Age, the path of the Vedas was destroyed and all men became Buddhists. Those who sought refuge with Vishnu were deluded.[13]

Some pre-13th-century Hindu texts, such as the Bhagavata Purana, portray the Buddha as born to lead the asuras, who oppressed the people, away from the Vedic rituals, which they were not worthy to perform.[9][2] Bhagavata Purana 1.3.24:

Then, in the beginning of Kali-yuga, for the purpose of confusing the enemies of the devas, [he] will become the son of Anjana, Buddha by name, in the Kīkaṭas.[web 1][note 2]

His father is usually called Śuddhodhana, which is consistent with the Buddhist tradition, while in a few places the Buddha's father is named Añjana or Jina. This is due to the fact that in some texts both Buddhism and Jainism are used by Vishnu to mislead the demons, and a confusion of names and doctrines appears, when the Buddha is called the son of Jina, mistakingly mimicking Buddhist texts which refer to the Buddha as Jina (conqueror), a term more often used in Jainism.[14]

Other texts portray him in a more positive way, as born to stop all killing of animals.[2] Only a few statements mention the worship of Buddha, e.g. the Varahapurana states that one desirous of beauty should worship him,[15] Some pre-14th-century Hindu temples include Buddha reliefs with the same reverence they show for other avatars of Vishnu,[16] but though an avatar of Vishnu, the Buddha is rarely worshipped like Krishna and Rama in Hinduism.[2]

Assimilation of Buddhist influencesEdit

 
Gautama Buddha as an avatar of Vishnu in a Persian-style painting

The adoption of Buddha may also have been a way to assimilate positive aspects of Buddhism into the fold of Hinduism.[17][2][3] According to Wendy Doniger, "Helmuth von Glasenapp attributed these developments to a Hindu desire to absorb Buddhism in a peaceful manner, both to win Buddhists to Vaishnavism and also to account for the fact that such a significant heresy could exist in India."[note 3]

According to Donald Swearer, the understanding of Buddha in Hinduism is a part of his wider and diverse influences. Even within Buddhism, states Swearer, Buddha and his ideas are conceptualized differently between Theravada, Mahayana, Tibetan, Japanese and other traditions. Similarly, in various traditions of Hinduism (and elsewhere), Buddha is accepted and interpreted in different ways.[18]

Mutual adoption of revered figuresEdit

Much like Hinduism's adoption of the Buddha as an avatar, Buddhism legends too adopted Krishna in their Jataka tales, claiming Krishna (Vishnu avatar) to be a character whom Buddha met and taught in his previous births.[19][note 4] According to Alf Hiltebeitel and other scholars, some of the stories in Buddha-related Jataka tales found in Pali texts seem slanderous distortions of Hindu legends, but these may reflect the ancient local traditions and the complexities of early interaction between the two Indian religions.[20]

While Hinduism adopted the Buddha in its mythology, Buddhism adopted the Hindu god Krishna in its own mythology. The story of Krishna occurs in the Jataka tales in Buddhism, for example.[web 2] The Vidhurapandita Jataka mentions Madhura (Sanskrit: Mathura); the Ghata Jataka mentions Kamsa, Devagabbha (Sk: Devaki), Upasagara or Vasudeva, Govaddhana (Sk: Govardhana), Baladeva (Balarama), and Kanha or Kesava (Sk: Krishna, Keshava).[21][22][note 5] While the Buddhist Jataka texts co-opt Krishna-Vasudeva and make him a student of the Buddha in his previous life,[19][note 4] the Hindu texts co-opt the Buddha and make him an avatar of Vishnu.[23][24] Similarly, in Dasaratha Jataka Buddha identifies himself as Rama.

RejectionEdit

Buddhists traditionally do not accept the Buddha to be a Vishnu avatar.[2][4] B. R. Ambedkar, the Dalit leader who in 1935 declared his intention to convert from Hinduism to Buddhism and converted about 20 years later, rejected the belief that Buddha was an incarnation of Vishnu.[25][note 6]

Some contemporary Hindus also reject the identification of Gautama Buddha as an avatar of Vishnu, referring to the texts of the Puranas. Swami Shri Nischalanada Saraswati, Shankaracharya of Govardhan Peeth, has stated that the Buddha avatar of Vishnu and Gautama Buddha were different persons.[29] Stephen Knapp argues that in Bhagavata Purana (1.3.24), "son of Ajana," refers to the Vishnu avatar, born 1800 BCE to Ajana, while Gautama was born to Maya and Śuddodhana.[web 3][30] Hughes argues that Sugata Buddha, an epithet for the Buddha, refers to the Vishnu avatar, not to Gautama Buddha.[31][note 7]

Contemporary reverenceEdit

 
Buddha as Vishnu at Chennakesava Temple (Somanathapura)
 
Buddha as an avatara at Airavatesvara Temple

Buddha is considered a holy being and revered as one who was awakened in India.[1] Outside India, some contemporary Hindus revere the Buddha along with other gods during their festivals.[32]

Prominent modern proponents of Hinduism, such as Sarvepalli Radhakrishnan and Swami Vivekananda, consider the Buddha as an example of the same universal truth that underlies religions.[note 8] A number of revolutionary figures in modern Hinduism, including Mahatma Gandhi, have been inspired by the life and teachings of the Buddha and many of his attempted reforms.[35] Steven Collins sees such Hindu claims regarding Buddhism as part of an effort - itself a reaction to Christian proselytizing efforts in India - to show that "all religions are one", and that Hinduism is uniquely valuable because it alone recognizes this fact.[36]

Some Hindus usually consider "Buddhism to be another form of Hinduism."[1] Various scholars in India, Sri Lanka and outside South Asia state that the colonial era and contemporary attempts to assimilate Buddha into the Hindu fold are a nationalistic political agenda, where "the Buddha has been reclaimed triumphantly as a symbol of indigenous nationalist understandings of India's history and culture".[37]

According to Lars Tore Flåten, Hindu perceptions, particularly in the literature by Hindu nationalists, are that "Buddha did not break away from the spiritual ideas of his age and country," claiming that scholars such as Hermann Oldenberg (1854-1920), Thomas Rhys Davids (1843-1922) and Sarvepalli Radhakrishnan (1888-1975) state there is much in common between "Buddhism and the contemporary Hinduism."[38][note 9] Yet, in present-day scholarly consensus, Buddhism is considered to be very different from pre-Buddhist Indian religion.[note 10]

See alsoEdit

NotesEdit

  1. ^ Coulter 2013, p. 109: "According to some, Buddha was the ninth avatar of Vishnu. Buddhists do not accept this theory."
  2. ^ tataḥ kalau sampravṛtte sammohāya sura-dviṣām
    :buddho nāmnāñjana-sutaḥ kīkaṭeṣu bhaviṣyati
  3. ^ Von Glasenapp 1962 page 113, cited in Doniger O'Flaherty 1988, p. 206
  4. ^ a b Krishna and Buddha interact in several Jataka tales such as number 454, 530 and 536. Vishnu appears in some Buddhist manuscripts as Venhu, but not as consistently as Krishna. In the Ghata Jataka, the Hindu god Krishna is depicted as an immature person and Buddha teaches him wisdom.(Sullivan 1999, pp. 103–105 with footnotes)(Hiltebeitel 1990, pp. 64–68)
  5. ^ The Arjuna and Krishna interaction is missing in the Jataka version. In the Buddhist version, Krishna laments in uncontrollable sorrow when his son dies, and a Ghatapandita feigns madness to teach Krishna a lesson.(Malalasekera 2007, pp. 825–826) The Jataka tale also includes an internecine destruction among his siblings after they all get drunk. Krishna also dies in the Buddhist legend by the hand of a hunter named Jara, but while he is traveling to a frontier city. Mistaking Krishna for a Deer, Jara throws a spear that fatally pierces his feet, causing Krishna great pain and then his death.(Francis & Thomas 1916, pp. 314–324) At the end of this Ghata-Jataka discourse, the Buddhist text declares that Sariputta, one of the revered disciples of the Buddha in the Buddhist tradition, was incarnated as Krishna in his previous life to learn lessons on grief from the Buddha in his prior rebirth: "Then he [Master] declared the Truths, and identified the Birth: 'At that time, Ananda was Rohineyya, Sariputta was Vasudeva [Krishna], the followers of the Buddha were the other persons, and I myself was Ghatapandita."(Cowell & Rouse 1901, p. 57)
  6. ^ Ambedkar, while he was a Hindu and before he launched a new form of Buddhism, reinterpreted Buddha's teachings into what he called Navayana (New Vehicle), wherein he developed a Marxist interpretation of said teachings. He founded and converted to a new version of Buddhism, a version which criticized and rejected Hinduism, but also Theravada Buddhism and Mahayana Buddhism because, according to Ambedkar, they all misrepresented the Buddha.[26][27][28]
  7. ^ See also:
    * Srila Bhakti Ballabh Tirtha Maharaja, Modern Buddha and Vishnu Avatar Buddha are Different
    * Tripathy, Byomakesh (May 2005). "Buddhist Remains in Western Orissa" (PDF). Orissa Review.
  8. ^ Universal truth:
    • Vivekananda: "May he who is the Brahman of the Hindus, the Ahura Mazda of Zoroastrians, the Buddha of Buddhists, the Jehovah of the Jews, the Father in Heavens of Christians, give strength to you to carry out your noble ideas!"[33]
    • Radhakrishnan: "If a Hindu chants the Vedas on the banks of the Ganges... if the Japanese worship the image of Buddha, if the European is convinced of Christ's mediatorship, if the Arab reads the Koran in the mosque... It is their deepest apprehension of God and God's fullest revelation to them."[34]
  9. ^ These perceptions cite, for example, the Pali scholar Rhys Davids' analysis in Buddhism: Being a Sketch of the Life and Teachings of Gautama, the Buddha, where he wrote: "But the foregoing account will be sufficient, I hope, to remove at least one misconception – the prevalent notion that Gautama was an enemy to Hinduism, and that his chief claim on the gratitude of his countrymen lies in his having destroyed a system of iniquity and oppression and fraud. This is not the case. Gautama was born, and brought up, and lived, and died a Hindu."[39] The Oxford professor and later President of India, Sarvepalli Radhakrishnan states that "as a matter of fact, nowhere did Buddha repudiate the Upanishad conception of Brahman, the absolute"; that Buddha, if anything, "accepted the Upanishad's position".[40][41]
  10. ^ For example, Indologist Richard Gombrich wrote that the Buddha was a radical religious reformer, making religious practice and salvation a more personal matter than it was before the arising of Buddhism.[42] Buddhologists like K.R. Norman and Richard Gombrich argue that the Buddha's anatta theory does indeed extend to the Brahmanical belief expounded in the Brihadaranyaka Upanishad that the Self (Atman) is the Universal Self, or Brahman.[43] They point to the Pali Alagaddūpama-sutta, where the Buddha argues that an individual cannot experience the suffering of the entire world.[44] Buddhism, like Hinduism and other major Indian religions, asserts that everything is impermanent (anicca), but, unlike them, also asserts that there is no permanent self or soul in living beings (anattā).[45][46][subnote 1] The ignorance or misperception (avijjā) that anything is permanent or that there is self in any being is considered a wrong understanding in Buddhism, and the primary source of clinging and suffering (dukkha).[47][48][49] Buddha endorsed and taught the concept of rebirth. This refers to a process whereby beings go through a succession of lifetimes as one of many possible forms of sentient life, each running from conception to death.[50] In Buddhist thought, however, this rebirth does not involve any soul, unlike Hinduism and Jainism.[51] According to Buddhism the atman concept is incorrect, untrue.[subnote 2]
Subnotes
  1. ^ [a] Anatta, Encyclopædia Britannica (2013), Quote: "Anatta in Buddhism, the doctrine that there is in humans no permanent, underlying soul. The concept of anatta, or anatman, is a departure from the Hindu belief in atman ("the self").";
    [b] Steven Collins (1994), Religion and Practical Reason (Editors: Frank Reynolds, David Tracy), State Univ of New York Press, ISBN 978-0791422175, page 64; "Central to Buddhist soteriology is the doctrine of not-self (Pali: anattā, Sanskrit: anātman, the opposed doctrine of ātman is central to Brahmanical thought). Put very briefly, this is the [Buddhist] doctrine that human beings have no soul, no self, no unchanging essence.";
    [c] John C. Plott et al (2000), Global History of Philosophy: The Axial Age, Volume 1, Motilal Banarsidass, ISBN 978-8120801585, page 63, Quote: "The Buddhist schools reject any Ātman concept. As we have already observed, this is the basic and ineradicable distinction between Hinduism and Buddhism";
    [d] Katie Javanaud (2013), Is The Buddhist 'No-Self' Doctrine Compatible With Pursuing Nirvana?, Philosophy Now;
    [e] David Loy (1982), Enlightenment in Buddhism and Advaita Vedanta: Are Nirvana and Moksha the Same?, International Philosophical Quarterly, Volume 23, Issue 1, pages 65–74
  2. ^ [a] Christmas Humphreys (2012). Exploring Buddhism. Routledge. pp. 42–43. ISBN 978-1-136-22877-3.
    [b] Brian Morris (2006). Religion and Anthropology: A Critical Introduction. Cambridge University Press. p. 51. ISBN 978-0-521-85241-8., Quote: "(...) anatta is the doctrine of non-self, and is an extreme empiricist doctrine that holds that the notion of an unchanging permanent self is a fiction and has no reality. According to Buddhist doctrine, the individual person consists of five skandhas or heaps – the body, feelings, perceptions, impulses and consciousness. The belief in a self or soul, over these five skandhas, is illusory and the cause of suffering."
    [c] Gombrich (2006), page 47, Quote: "(...) Buddha's teaching that beings have no soul, no abiding essence. This 'no-soul doctrine' (anatta-vada) he expounded in his second sermon."

ReferencesEdit

  1. ^ a b c d e Jones & Ryan 2006, p. 96.
  2. ^ a b c d e f Lochtefeld 2002, p. 73, 128.
  3. ^ a b Holt 2008, p. 18–21.
  4. ^ a b Coulter 2013, p. 109.
  5. ^ a b Srinivasan 2011, p. 182.
  6. ^ a b Holt, Kinnard & Walters 2012, p. 4, 95, 111.
  7. ^ Holt 2008, p. 8–22.
  8. ^ Doniger O'Flaherty 1988, p. 200.
  9. ^ a b Doniger O'Flaherty 1988, p. 188.
  10. ^ Holt 2004, p. 12, 15.
  11. ^ Dhere Ramchandra Chintaman, Shri Vitthal: ek maha samanvaya, Shri Vidya Prakashan, Pune, 1984 (Marathi)
  12. ^ Doniger O'Flaherty 1988, p. 198-203.
  13. ^ Doniger O'Flaherty 1988, p. 202-203.
  14. ^ Doniger O'Flaherty 1988, p. 188-189.
  15. ^ Singh, p.267
  16. ^ Kramrisch 1946, p. 349–350.
  17. ^ Doniger O'Flaherty 1988, p. 204-211.
  18. ^ Swearer 2016, p. 678–683.
  19. ^ a b Cowell & Rouse 1901, p. 57.
  20. ^ Hiltebeitel 1990, p. 64–68.
  21. ^ Law, B. C. (1941). India as Described in Early Texts of Buddhism and Jainism. Luzac. pp. 99–101.
  22. ^ Jaiswal, S. (1974). "Historical Evolution of the Ram Legend". Social Scientist. 21 (3–4): 89–97. doi:10.2307/3517633. JSTOR 3517633.
  23. ^ Daniel E Bassuk (1987). Incarnation in Hinduism and Christianity: The Myth of the God-Man. Palgrave Macmillan. p. 40. ISBN 978-1-349-08642-9.
  24. ^ Edward Geoffrey Parrinder (1997). Avatar and Incarnation: The Divine in Human Form in the World's Religions. Oxford: Oneworld. pp. 19–24, 35–38, 75–78, 130–133. ISBN 978-1-85168-130-3.
  25. ^ Michael Jerryson (2016). The Oxford Handbook of Contemporary Buddhism. Oxford University Press. pp. 47–48. ISBN 978-0-19-936238-7.
  26. ^ Christopher Queen (2015). Steven M. Emmanuel (ed.). A Companion to Buddhist Philosophy. John Wiley & Sons. pp. 524–529. ISBN 978-1-119-14466-3.
  27. ^ Skaria, A (2015). "Ambedkar, Marx and the Buddhist Question". Journal of South Asian Studies. Taylor & Francis. 38 (3): 450–452. doi:10.1080/00856401.2015.1049726., Quote: "Here [Navayana Buddhism] there is not only a criticism of religion (most of all, Hinduism, but also prior traditions of Buddhism), but also of secularism, and that criticism is articulated moreover as a religion."
  28. ^ Eleanor Zelliot (2015). Knut A. Jacobsen (ed.). Routledge Handbook of Contemporary India. Taylor & Francis. pp. 13, 361–370. ISBN 978-1-317-40357-9.
  29. ^ "शंकराचार्य ने भगवान बुद्ध व गौतम बुद्ध को बता दिया अलग-अलग व्यक्ति..जानिए". Dainik Jagran (in Hindi). Retrieved 2021-06-12.
  30. ^ Vaswani, J. P. (2017-12-22). Dasavatara. Jaico Publishing House. ISBN 978-93-86867-18-6.
  31. ^ David Bruce Hughes. Śrī Vedānta-sūtra, Adhyāya 2.
  32. ^ Timothy P. Daniels (2005). Building Cultural Nationalism in Malaysia: Identity, Representation, and Citizenship. Psychology Press. pp. 129–130. ISBN 978-0-415-94971-2.
  33. ^ Hinduism, in The World's Parliament of Religions, J. H. Barrows (Ed.), Vol. II, Chicago 1893, p. 978.
  34. ^ Eastern Religions and Western Thought, New York 1969, pp. 326–7.
  35. ^ "Mahatma Gandhi and Buddhism" (PDF). Retrieved 2012-08-14.
  36. ^ Steven Collins, Selfless Persons. Cambridge University Press, 1990, page 9.
  37. ^ John Clifford Holt (2008). The Buddhist Viṣṇu: Religious Transformation, Politics, and Culture. Motilal Banarsidass. pp. 18–23, 31–32. ISBN 978-81-208-3269-5.
  38. ^ Lars Tore Flåten (2016). Hindu Nationalism, History and Identity in India: Narrating a Hindu past under the BJP. Taylor & Francis. pp. 90–93. ISBN 978-1-317-20871-6.
  39. ^ K N Jayatilleke (2013). Early Buddhist Theory of Knowledge. Routledge (Originally published in 1963). pp. 369–370, see paragraph numbered 625. ISBN 978-1-134-54287-1.
  40. ^ TRV Murti (1992). Paul Arthur Schilpp (ed.). The Philosophy of Sarvepalli Radhakrishnan. Motilal Banarsidass. pp. 572–573. ISBN 978-81-208-0792-1.
  41. ^ S Radhakrishnan, Indian Philosophy, Volume 1, George Allen, page 682
  42. ^ Gombrich, Richard F. (2006). Theravāda Buddhism: A Social History from Ancient Benares to Modern Colombo (PDF) (2nd ed.). Routledge. p. 78. ISBN 978-0-203-01603-9. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2017-11-17. Retrieved 2021-06-10.
  43. ^ Gombrich; Recovering the Buddha's Message © The Buddhist Forum, Vol I, Seminar Papers 1987–1988
  44. ^ Norman, KR; A note on Attā in the Alagaddūpama Sutta – 1981
  45. ^ Anatta Buddhism, Encyclopædia Britannica (2013)
  46. ^ [a] Christmas Humphreys (2012). Exploring Buddhism. Routledge. pp. 42–43. ISBN 978-1-136-22877-3.
    [b] Gombrich (2006), page 47, Quote: "(...) Buddha's teaching that beings have no soul, no abiding essence. This 'no-soul doctrine' (anatta-vada) he expounded in his second sermon."
  47. ^ Brian Morris (2006). Religion and Anthropology: A Critical Introduction. Cambridge University Press. p. 51. ISBN 978-0-521-85241-8., Quote: "(...) anatta is the doctrine of non-self, and is an extreme empiricist doctrine that holds that the notion of an unchanging permanent self is a fiction and has no reality. According to Buddhist doctrine, the individual person consists of five skandhas or heaps – the body, feelings, perceptions, impulses and consciousness. The belief in a self or soul, over these five skandhas, is illusory and the cause of suffering."
  48. ^ Richard Francis Gombrich; Cristina Anna Scherrer-Schaub (2008). Buddhist Studies. Motilal Banarsidass. pp. 209–210. ISBN 978-81-208-3248-0.
  49. ^ Frank Hoffman; Deegalle Mahinda (2013). Pali Buddhism. Routledge. pp. 162–165. ISBN 978-1-136-78553-5.
  50. ^ Keown, Damien (1996). Buddhism: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford University Press. p. 107.
  51. ^ Oliver Leaman (2002). Eastern Philosophy: Key Readings. Routledge. pp. 23–27. ISBN 978-1-134-68919-4.

SourcesEdit

Printed sources

Web-sources
  1. ^ a b "Bhagavata Purana 1.3.24". Srimadbhagavatam.com. Archived from the original on 2007-09-26. Retrieved 2012-08-14.
  2. ^ "Andhakavenhu Puttaa". www.vipassana.info. Retrieved 2008-06-15.
  3. ^ Stephen Knapp, Were There Two Buddhas?